How brutal is the political life. Survey that ministerial team: every minister is grappling with exceptionally challenging portfolios lacking the resources to do what they recognize is needed.
Their inheritance was more catastrophic than expected: they were left with traps, misleading obstacles and gaping holes. Brexit is emerging as more economically devastating than foreseen, now losing the exchequer £80bn annually.
They suffer from poor fortune: the Trump presidency coincided with their watch. What worse mishap than a jail staff member releasing a denied migrant sexual predator? Migrant crossings feel incessant.
An unfortunate internal party vote right now was certain to give the Labour leader a bruising. The 11% vote share at the Caerphilly Senedd special election might not even be their worst performance.
They anticipate criticism, but they are human. Frequently, the Labour MP boldly states what all can see: that exists "deep disillusionment in this country at the moment" and "a growing sense of despair about whether anyone is capable of turning this country round".
Yet, even so, the current vitriolic state of voter perception is confusing and concerning. The Labour leader is the least popular prime minister on record. Really?
He represents a honorable, committed person of noble purposes, devoid of unwarranted superiority or vanity. Contrast this with the Conservative leader, Liz Truss, or the relaxed confidence of the ex-Prime Minister, all with so little to warrant arrogant assurance.
Yet, the public argues, the Labour leader is more ineffective. In his leadership role, he's short on personal magnetism, according to critics: more significantly, he is missing governing flexibility, ingenuity or sense of changing opinions.
Labour blundered concerning decreases for pensioners and disabled people, offset by expanded benefits in different sectors. Uncertain which voters to appeal to, the party has left beneficial programs unpromoted, from working rights to green investment, housing projects and employment assurances for young people.
Too many close advisers continue to believe conservative-leaning voters requires courting, when significantly more electors have leaned liberal since the government formed. Survey specialist John Curtice advises the party to stop chasing Reform voters: they've departed.
Keir Starmer is failing; this cannot be disputed when pollsters suggest no politician would bounce back from these record-low ratings.
Yet, during unknown circumstances of significant fluctuation, conventional wisdom could prove irrelevant. The Prime Minister rescued Labour from a post-Jeremy Corbyn slough of despond that history said couldn't be reversed in four years.
Might a different politician perform more effectively, or has society entered a virtually unmanageable, insatiable public state of mind? All ruling parties may be rejected just as rapidly following election, however great its landslide victory, except if it comes bearing quick fixes bearing untold bounty for underfunded government departments and financially strained households.
Predictably, concern within the parliamentary party will make discussion about replacing the leader commonplace if May's elections go as badly as predicted – or, certain observers propose, before that.
Officials face a contradiction: Labour's only hope emerges from difficulty. Prepare for being defeated regardless, so use this massive majority for four more years to follow their natural progressive principles: make radical tax reforms, raising plenty.
Expect to lose subsequent votes, so implement all policies immediately. Ignore survey results and focus groups; allow citizens to observe authentic dedication. The exclusive approach to restore some respect is to execute clearly what they consider most just and equitable.
The Chancellor correctly describes Reform "the single greatest threat" to British values. While Conservatives largely align with Reform, a voting agreement of particular nature threatens.
The party's obligation is to take all necessary measures to stop this development. Anticipate alliances, stay suitable for allied groups when political labels is overshadowed by the deep red line against a governance risk unseen in contemporary politics.
Such is an objective to drive out despair.