A Danish man has been found guilty of sharing nude segments from protected movies and TV series on the online platform Reddit.
Based on a police report reviewed by BBC News, the unnamed individual shared 347 video excerpts of nude scenes in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.
Danish authorities state he has been given a 7-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.
Legal analysts say the defendant was prosecuted under a rarely-used provision in Denmark's copyright law, with the judge finding that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the accused had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".
He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted data.
From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit scenes featuring over 100 female performers.
He distributed them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.
According to the Danish anti-piracy group the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and participants were encouraged to ask for excerpts of particular actors.
In 2023, campaigners filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected artists, directors and production companies, which led to the subreddit being shut down.
One actress, one of the actresses whose nude content were circulated in the community, explained to Danish broadcasters at the time she felt there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a movie and being shown on Reddit.
The actress stated the posts constituted "abuse".
The defendant was detained in September 2024 and pleaded culpable to the charges recently.
In a comment after the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the decision sent an "significant" signal "indicating infringements of creators' entitlements has repercussions".
The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in Denmark for its use of the "moral rights" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an creator's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their standing.
Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the damage to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them financially.
How the ruling could affect other countries is uncertain.
But she added there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the future with the advancement of AI, where "the sanctity of an individual's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".